Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Journal of Obstrectic Anaesthesia and Critical Care
Search articles
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size Users Online: 239

 Table of Contents  
ERRATUM
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 172

Erratum: Enhanced recovery after cesarean protocol versus traditional protocol in elective cesarean section: A prospective observational study


Date of Web Publication02-Sep-2022

Correspondence Address:
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2249-4472.355359

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
. Erratum: Enhanced recovery after cesarean protocol versus traditional protocol in elective cesarean section: A prospective observational study. J Obstet Anaesth Crit Care 2022;12:172

How to cite this URL:
. Erratum: Enhanced recovery after cesarean protocol versus traditional protocol in elective cesarean section: A prospective observational study. J Obstet Anaesth Crit Care [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 4];12:172. Available from: https://www.joacc.com/text.asp?2022/12/2/172/355359



In the original article titled “Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Protocol versus Traditional Protocol in Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective Observational Study”, published on pages 28-33, Issue 1, Volume 12 in Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care,[1] the footerwas inadvertently missed. The footer should read as below:

This article is based on a study first presented as an oral paper in AOA National Conference with the title “Impact of implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in elective caesarean section- A prospective observational study”[2] The study has been published in part as abstract in International Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia, June 2021, Vol 46, Supplement 1, 103012 with the title 'Impact of implementation of ERAS protocol in elective caesarean section'.[3]



 
  References Top

1.
Gupta S, Gupta A, Baghel AS, Sharma K, Choudhary S, Choudhary V. Enhanced recovery after cesarean protocol versus traditional protocol in elective cesarean section: A prospective observational study. J Obstet Anaesth Crit Care 2022;12:28-33  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Baghel AS. Impact of implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in elective caesarean section- A prospective observational study. Presented at 14th National conference of Association of Obstetric Anaesthesia of India; 2021, Sep 23rd-25th; Hyderabad, India.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Choudhary S, Gupta S, Baghel AS, Sharma K. Impact of implementation of ERAS protocol in elective caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2021;46:103012.  Back to cited text no. 3
    




 

Top
 
 
Search
Similar in PUBMED
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed172    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded27    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal