Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Journal of Obstrectic Anaesthesia and Critical Care
Search articles
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size Users Online: 242

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 21-25

Comparison of the analgesic effects of intravenous magnesium sulfate infusion versus intrathecal fentanyl in patients with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing caesarean section


1 Anaesthesia and SICU, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt

Date of Web Publication25-Aug-2011

Correspondence Address:
Ahmed Said Elgebaly
Anaesthesia and SICU, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Eygpt.43 IBN ELFARD Str., Elgharbia, Tanta
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2249-4472.84251

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background : A double-blinded, prospective, randomized, controlled study was designed to determine the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of intravenous magnesium sulfate versus intrathecal fentanyl, in patients with severe pre-eclampsia, scheduled for caesarean section, under spinal anaesthesia.
Materials and Methods : One hundred and five patients were randomly allocated to one of the three groups; the control group B received spinal anaesthesia with 10 mg of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine, the test group FB received spinal anaesthesia with 10 mg of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 25 ΅g of preservative-free fentanyl and the test group MB received spinal anaesthesia with 10 mg of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine along with intravenous magnesium sulfate (6 gm iv as a loading dose over 20-30 minutes, followed by infusion of magnesium sulfate 2 gm per hour for 24 hours).
Results : The time required for the first postoperative analgesic requirement was significantly more in groups FB and MB, as compared to the control group. (Group FB: 6.85 + 1.7 hours, group MB: 7.05 + 1.95 hours and Group B: 3.75 + 0.75 hours). This difference, however, was not significant between group FB and group MB. The frequency of postoperative analgesic requirement was significantly less in the FB and MB groups, as compared to the control group. (Control group: 3.9 + 0.5, group FB 2.3 + 0.25 and group MB: 2.5 + 0.4). Perioperative sedation was significantly higher in group FB as compared to group B and group MB. Nine patients in group FB had postoperative nausea and vomiting, whereas, none of the patients in the control group or group MB experienced this. This difference too was statistically significant.
Conclusion : Intravenous magnesium sulfate and intrathecal fentanyl in the doses mentioned, increased the duration of postoperative analgesia in severely pre-eclamptic patients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia; however, patients who received intravenous magnesium sulfate experienced lesser side effects than those who received intrathecal fentanyl.

Keywords: Caesarean section, intrathecal fentanyl, magnesium sulfate, postoperative analgesia, severe pre-eclampsia


How to cite this article:
Elgebaly AS, Eldabaa AA, Abd ELhafez AA, Abdalla MM. Comparison of the analgesic effects of intravenous magnesium sulfate infusion versus intrathecal fentanyl in patients with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing caesarean section. J Obstet Anaesth Crit Care 2011;1:21-5

How to cite this URL:
Elgebaly AS, Eldabaa AA, Abd ELhafez AA, Abdalla MM. Comparison of the analgesic effects of intravenous magnesium sulfate infusion versus intrathecal fentanyl in patients with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing caesarean section. J Obstet Anaesth Crit Care [serial online] 2011 [cited 2020 Nov 25];1:21-5. Available from: https://www.joacc.com/text.asp?2011/1/1/21/84251


  Introduction Top


Intravenous magnesium sulfate during spinal anaesthesia has been shown to improve postoperative analgesia in non-obstetric surgery. [1] However, there are only few reports regarding the effects of intravenous magnesium sulfate after spinal anaesthesia in patients with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing caesarean sections. [2]

Magnesium sulfate has been used in obstetrics since 1925, for prevention of seizures in eclampsia, with the advantage of decreasing peripheral vascular resistance, without changing the uterine blood flow. [2] The advantages of magnesium sulfate in anaesthesia have been increasing over the years to include situations out of the obstetric field. It has analgesic and sedative properties with potential neuro- and cardioprotective effects, although the mechanisms of these actions are still unknown. [2],[3]

Previously, spinal anaesthesia was relatively contraindicated in patients with severe pre-eclampsia, due to the potential risk of sudden hypotension, with a rapid onset of sympathetic blockade. [4] However, low-dose spinal anaesthesia offered many advantages, which included simplicity, rapidity, reliability, predictability, safety for the mother and newborn, cost-effectiveness and effective perioperative analgesia. [5],[6]

Intrathecal opioids are a popular additive to enhance the potency and duration of the neuraxial blockade and they lengthen the postoperative analgesic period. [7] Nevertheless, they are fraught with side effects like pruritus, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), urine retention and respiratory depression. [8] Therefore, anaesthesiologists are increasingly turning to non-opioid adjuvants for managing pain during the perioperative period, to minimize the adverse effects of analgesic medications. [9],[10] Intravenous magnesium sulfate infusion is reported to have antinociceptive and effective analgesic and sedative properties. [11] Magnesium has postsynaptic N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist and calcium channel blocker properties. It has been used successfully to potentiate opioid analgesia and to treat neuropathic pain in animals. [11],[12] Tramer et al.,[13] conducted the first clinical trial showing that perioperative administration of magnesium sulfate is associated with lower analgesic requirements in the postoperative period. The present study is initiated to study the postoperative analgesic effect of intravenous magnesium sulfate infusion and compare it with that of intrathecal fentanyl, in patients with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing caesarean sections under spinal anaesthesia.


  Materials and Methods Top


A double blinded, randomized, controlled study was carried out with the approval of the Ethics and Research Committee of the Institution. A written informed consent was obtained from 105 severely pre-eclamptic patients (gestation 31 - 40 weeks) scheduled for elective or urgent caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia, during a two-year period. Severe pre-eclampsia was defined as a systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP) of 160 mm Hg or more or a diastolic arterial blood pressure (DAP) of 110 mm Hg or more and proteinuria of 100 mg/dL or more. [14] Patients with eclampsia, coagulopathy, placental abruption, severe fetal distress, contraindications to regional anaesthesia or a history of allergy to local anaesthetics were excluded from the study. On arrival at the Operating Room, two peripheral venous cannulae and a urinary catheter were inserted and all the patients were preloaded with 10 ml / kg Lactated Ringer's solution. Monitoring consisted of echocardiogram (ECG), pulse oximeter and non-invasive blood pressure recording. Ramsay's score [15] was used to monitor the sedation levels. Intravenous hydralazine 5 mg was given to all patients at 20-minute intervals, to decrease the DAP to about 90 mm Hg, prior to the start of anaesthesia.

Spinal anaesthesia was administered in the sitting position with a 25 G needle, under strict aseptic conditions in the L3-4 space. The patients were randomly divided into the following three groups by the sealed envelopes method. [16] Group B patients (control) received 10 mg (2 ml) heavy bupivacaine 0.5% + 1 ml saline intrathecally, group FB patients received 10 mg (2 ml) heavy bupivacaine plus 25 μg (diluted in 1 ml) preservative-free fentanyl intrathecally and group MB patients received 10 mg (2 ml) heavy bupivacaine 0.5% + 1 ml saline intrathecally, plus an intravenous bolus of magnesium sulfate, 6 gm (60 ml), diluted with 100 ml of normal saline, over 30 minutes before administration of spinal anaesthesia. This was followed by an infusion of magnesium sulfate 2 gm per hour diluted in 40 ml normal saline (total 60 ml) at the rate of 1 ml per minute, for 24 hours.

In addition, both group B and group FB patients received a bolus of 160 ml infusion of normal saline over 30 minutes before the start of the spinal block, followed by an infusion of 60 ml normal saline at the rate of 1 ml per minute, for 24 hours.

All the medications were prepared by an anaesthesiologist who was not involved in any other aspect of the study. All syringes were identical and had similar volumes of the test and placebo solutions. The investigator who administered the drug, the anaesthesiologist who performed the intrathecal injections and the patients, were unaware of the group allocated and the drug that was received by the patient.

All the patients were closely observed and monitored for any seizures and in case the same occurred the patients were managed as per standard protocol and excluded from the study.

At the end of the procedure, the patients were observed for six hours in the recovery room, where a postoperative analgesic protocol was followed, in the form of paracetamol 500 mg, given intravenously, to be administered to the patient at the start of pain sensation at the site of the surgery. Subsequent doses of paracetamol were given on the patient's request, with a maximum of 3 gm in a 24-hour period.

During the first 24 hours in the postoperative period an anaesthetist, who was not part of the anaesthesia team, visited the patients and assessed them hourly. Hemodynamic parameters, pain score on VAS (0 = no pain and 100 = worst imaginable pain), neurological signs for hyper-magnesemia (positive patellar reflex), oliguria (urine output less than 25 mL / hour), respiratory depression (rate less than 8 / minute), the time to the first analgesic requirement and the number of analgesic doses required were noted. The other side effects noted were - incidence and severity of PONV (by four-point verbal rating score where 0 = none, 1 = nausea, 2 = vomited once and 3 = repeated vomiting), pruritus, sensory / motor disturbances and bowel and bladder dysfunction.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for normally distributed parametric data. Time for the first analgesia, pain scores at the first pain medication and the number of analgesics requested in 24 hours were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the post hoc multiple comparison tests using the Dunnett method. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


  Results Top


One hundred and five patients were randomized into the study, of which fifteen patients were excluded. Of these, six had inadequate anaesthesia and were given general anaesthesia. Three patients went into active labor, two patients developed seizures and four patients had surgical complications leading to prolonged surgical time. Statistical analysis was performed in the remaining 90 patients, 30 in each group.

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regard to patient demography and the duration of the caesarean section [Table 1]. The time to the first analgesic intake in group FB was 6.85 ± 1.7 hours and in group MB was 7.05 ± 1.95 hours. These timings were comparable. The time to the first analgesic intake in group B was 3.7 + 0.75 hours, which was significantly less when compared to that of group FB and group MB ( p < 0.01) [Table 2]. VAS at the time of the first analgesic requirement was comparable in the three groups [Table 2]. The frequency of analgesic intake was significantly less in the group FB and group MB as compared to group B ( P < 0.01) [Table 2]. None of the patients in group B and group MB had PONV, whereas, nine patients (30%) in the FB group had PONV. Perioperative sedation was noted to be significantly higher in the FB group (14 patients (47%)) as compared to the control and MB groups. Pruritus was significantly higher in the FB group compared to the other groups [Table 3]. Urine retention occurred in all the three groups, but the incidence was comparable. None of the patients experienced apneic spells, bradypnea or desaturation in the postoperative period [Table 3].
Table 1: Demographic data and duration of surgery

Click here to view
Table 2: Postoperative analgesia

Click here to view
Table 3: Perioperative adverse events

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Magnesium is a calcium channel blocker and N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist. It has been explored for a role in postoperative pain, sensitization processes and hyperalgesia, throughout the early postoperative period. [17],[18] The adjuvant analgesic effect of magnesium has been probably attributed to the activation of the NMDA receptors of the dorsal horn and the process of central sensitization.[19],[20] The dosage used in this study resulted in an analgesic effect, without any adverse reactions. We hypothesize that at this dosage the levels of magnesium in the cerebrospinal fluid rose sufficiently to depress the electrophysiological effect of the NMDA receptors. The results of the present study demonstrate that the infusion of magnesium significantly delays the need for the first analgesic requirement in the subgroup of patients studied, when compared to the need for the first analgesic requirement in patients who received a placebo infusion (7.05 ± 1.95 hours versus 3.7 ± 0.75 hours). A similar delay in the need for the first analgesic requirement was seen in patients who received intrathecal fentanyl (6.85 ± 1.7 hours versus 3.7 ± 0.75 hours). The time taken for this was less in patients who received intrathecal fentanyl than those who received a magnesium infusion, however, this difference was not statistically significant. Many studies have confirmed the efficacy of the opioid-sparing effect of intravenous magnesium sulfate. In their study on patients undergoing vitrectomy, Schulz-stubner et al.,[21] recommended the use of magnesium sulfate as a safe analgesic adjuvant. They attributed its analgesic effect to its calcium blocking properties and inhibition of neurotransmitter and catecholamine release. Ryu et al.,[22] showed that the infusion of magnesium sulfate during total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with propofol infusion did not reduce propofol and remifentanil requirements, although the quality of postoperative analgesia was better in patients who received magnesium. In another recent report, Seyhan et al.[23] compared the effects of magnesium sulfate on propofol requirements, hemodynamic variables and postoperative pain relief and observed significant reductions in intraoperative propofol, atracurium and postoperative morphine consumption. Studies [24] have observed results similar to our findings in context to the prolongation of analgesia produced by spinal bupivacaine, when administered either with intrathecal fentanyl or intravenous magnesium infusion.

Intrathecal fentanyl usage is very popular, but is associated with distressing side effects like postoperative nausea, vomiting, pruritus and sedation. In the present study the patients who received intravenous magnesium instead of intrathecal fentanyl did not have any of these common side effects. Magnesium could be very useful for multimodal postoperative pain relief in patients with a history of PONV or cardiac or respiratory diseases, commonly seen in severe pre-eclamptic patients undergoing caesarean section.

There are two main limitations to the present study. First is the inability to measure serum magnesium concentrations. However, it is known that the plasma magnesium concentration does not represent the magnesium content of the tissues. The lack of correlation between plasma magnesium and total body magnesium content in healthy subjects is also well-recognized. [25] Arnold and colleagues [26] have shown that the measurements of intra- and extracellular magnesium concentrations do not predict the magnesium levels in other body tissues accurately. Doses of magnesium, similar to the ones used in this study, have been shown to produce reductions in analgesic requirements, both during and after surgical interventions. [27] Second, limitation of the present study is the absence of data regarding the evaluation of the outcomes of the newborns in the three groups.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the analgesic efficacy of intravenous magnesium in severely pre-eclamptic patients is similar to that seen with intrathecal fentanyl in patients undergoing caesarean sections under a subarachnoid block. Magnesium infusion in such patients also avoids distressing side effects of intrathecal fentanyl like PONV, pruritus, respiratory depression and sedation.

 
  References Top

1.Hwang JY, Na HS, Jeon YT, Ro YJ, Kim CS, Do SH. I.V. infusion of magnesium sulfate during spinal anaesthesia improves postoperative analgesia. Br J Anaesth 2010;104:89-93.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Barbosa FT, Barbosa LT, Jucá MJ, Cunha RM. Applications of magnesium sulfate in obstetrics and anaesthesia. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2010;60:104-10.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Wadhwa A, Sengupta P, Durrani J, Akça O, Lenhardt R, Sessler DI, et al. Magnesium sulfate only slightly reduces the shivering threshold in humans. Br J Anaesth 2005;94:756-62.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Lindheimer MD, Katz AL. Medical intelligence. Current concepts, Hypertension in pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1985;11:675-80.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Mohamed Ezzat Moemen. Pre-Eclamptic Pregnancy. EgJA 2007;23:1-6.   Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Nassar AH, Sakhel K, Maarouf H, Naassan GR, Usta IM. Adverse maternal and neonatal outcome of prolonged course of magnesium sulfate tocolysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:1099-103.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
7.Cousins MJ, Mather LE. Intrathecal and epidural administration of opiates. Anesthesiology 1984;61:276-80.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
8.Morgan M. The rational use of intrathecal and extradural opioids. Br J Anaesth 1989;63:165-88.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
9.Eriksson H, Tenhunen A, Korttila K. Balanced analgesia improves recovery and outcome after outpatient tubal ligation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996;40:151-5.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Pavlin DJ, Horvath KD, Pavlin EG, Sima K. Preincisional treatment to prevent pain after ambulatory hernia surgery. Anesth Analg 2003;97:1627-32.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
11.Takano Y, Sato E, Kaneko T, Sato I. Antihyperalgesic effects of intrathecally administered magnesium sulfate in rats. Pain 2000;84:175-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
12.Begon S, Pickering G, Eschalier A, Dubray C. Magnesium increases morphine analgesic effect in different experimental models of pain. Anesthesiology 2002;96:627-32.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
13.Tramer MR, Schneider J, Marti R, Rifat K. Role of magnesium sulfate in postoperative analgesia. Anesthesiology 1996;84:340-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Landau R, Irion O. Recent data on the physiopathology of pre-eclampsia and recommendations for treatment. Rev Med Suisse 2005;1:290, 292-5.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br Med J 1974;2:656-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
16.Pocock SJ. Method of randomization. In: Pocock SJ, editor. Clinical trials: A practical approach. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1994. p. 66-89.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Kehlet H, Dahl JB. The value of "multimodal" or "balanced analgesia" in postoperative pain treatment. Anesth Analg 1993;77:1048-56.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
18.Ferrante FM, Chan VW, Arthur GR, Rocco AG. Interpleural analgesia after thoracotomy. Anesth Analg 1991;72:105-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
19.Iseri LT, French JH. Magnesium: Nature's physiologic calcium blocker. Am Heart J 1984;108:188-93.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
20.Coderre TJ, Melzack R. The role of NMDA receptor operated calcium channels in persistent nociception after formalin induced tissue injury. J Neurosci 1992;12(9):3671-5.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Schulz-stubner S, Wettmann G, Reyle-Hahn SM, Rossaint R. Magnesium as a part of balanced general anaesthesia with propofol, remifentanil and mivacurium: A double blind, randomized, prospective study in 50 patients. Eur J Anesthesiol 2001;18:723-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Ryu JH, Kang MH, Park KS, DO SH. Effects of magnesium sulfate on intraoperative anaesthetic requirements and postoperative analgesia in gynecology patients receiving total intravenous anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2008;100:397-403.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
23.Seyhan To, Tugrul M, Sungur MO, Kayacan S, Telcil L, Pembeci K, et al. Effects of three different doses regeimns of magnesium on propofol requirements, hemodynamic variables and post operative pain relief in gynecology surgery. Br J Anaesth 2006;96:247-52.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Fawzy AA, Abdelfatah AM, Al-Azazi HM. The postoperative analgesic effect of intrathecal fentanyl versus midazolam in knee arthroscopy. EgJA 2003;19:173-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Dyckner T, Wester PO. Magnesium deficiency. Guidelines for diagnosis and substitution therapy. Acta Med Scand Suppl 1982;661:37-41.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]    
26.Arnold A, Tovey P, Mangat P, Penny W, Jacobs S. Magnesium deficiency in critically ill patients. Anaesthesia 1995;50:203-5.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Koinig H, Wallner T, Marhofer P, Andel H, Hörauf K, Mayer N. Magnesium sulfate reduces intra- and postoperative analgesic requirements. Anesth Analg 1998;87:206-10.  Back to cited text no. 27
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
Search
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5321    
    Printed234    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded805    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal