Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Journal of Obstrectic Anaesthesia and Critical Care
Search articles
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size Users Online: 439
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 26-32

Prophylactic crystalloids or prophylactic crystalloids with ephedrine: Comparison of hemodynamic effects during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia using 0.5% bupivacaine


Department of Anaesthesiology, Karwar Institute of Medical Sciences, Karwar, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Manjunath Timmappa Bhat
Department of Anaesthesiology, Karwar Institute of Medical Sciences, Karwar - 581 301, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/joacc.JOACC_37_16

Rights and Permissions

Background: Spinal anaesthesia is usually chosen for caesarean section not only because of its faster onset and reliability but also because general anaesthesia is associated with more complications. However, hypotension is one of the most common complications of spinal anaesthesia in obstetric patients. Several measures have been devised to prevent hypotension, which include left uterine displacement, infusion of crystalloids before giving spinal anaesthesia (preloading) and administration of a prophylactic vasopressor. This study compared the hemodynamic effects of preloading crystalloids or crystalloids with ephedrine for caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia using 0.5% bupivacaine. Materials and Method: In this randomized, single blind, comparative clinical study, 80 parturients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1) presenting for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were allocated to one of the two groups; group I received crystalloid preload and group II received crystalloid with ephedrine before spinal block. After institution of spinal anaesthesia in the lateral position with 2.0 ml (10 mg) of bupivacaine, 0.5% (heavy) using 25 G Quincke type spinal needle, parturients were made to assume a supine position with left lateral tilt. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were monitored intraoperatively every 2 minutes till delivery and every 5 minutes after delivery. The amount of ephedrine used intraoperatively was also noted and compared among different groups. Results: Incidence of hypotension was 70% in the crystalloid group and 5% in the crystalloid with ephedrine group. This difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The number of patients receiving rescue bolus of ephedrine was higher in the crystalloid group (40% before delivery and 30% after delivery) compared to crystalloid with ephedrine group (5% before delivery and none after delivery); the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Sixteen patients (40%) in the crystalloid group experienced nausea compared to 6 patients (15%) in the crystalloid with ephedrine group; the difference was statistically significant with a P value of 0.012. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that prophylactic ephedrine given by infusion along with crystalloids is not only a simple and effective method for prevention of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia during elective caesarean section in ASA Grade I patients but also contributes to less incidence of intraoperative nausea and vomiting.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed744    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded157    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal